Let me preface my remarks by declaring my bias – I want zune to succeed because:

  • I used to work for Microsoft and know some dudes involved


  • I am proud to have played a small part in this product from a local audio guru (Vaf)
  • My life would be more flexible if the MSFT stock price got into the $100’s again!
  • Getting peer to peer sharing of user generated multimedia content

    right would be a win-win to the power of some large number – it could

    make the world a more interesting place and increase the value of lots

    of things I do.

From my understanding of the universe the major obstacle to

exponential growth in coolness and market value of creative work on the

read/write web is the legal framework that Creative Commons addresses.

Once we figure out how to set digital content free (and find business

models that get rewards for creators) it won’t be long before all

restricted digital content is relegated to the ghetto that will feed on

all attempts to artifically restrict bits to the behavior of atoms.

So when I saw this my heart sank:


Zune, Creative Commons don’t mix:

"Zune, Creative Commons don’t mixWired News: Zune, Creative Commons

Don’t Mix. Microsoft’s efforts to loosen up access to closely held

music owned by record labels has an unintended consequence: It punishes artists who want to share."


(Via Darknet.)

Now the pessimist in me suspects that the first release of zune will

come with many limiting unintended consequences (just like my xbox

before I had it chipped).  But even without much reading around the

links, it soon became clear that there is still some hope for zune.

From the wired article Zune, Creative Commons Don’t Mix


Microsoft confirmed that an unprotected MP3 file loaded onto one Zune

and then sent to another remains identical to the first copy. A company

representative told me: "We are not applying any ‘DRM’ to any files

that weren’t already protected. No file that has (for instance) a

Creative Commons license or is unprotected will have any encryption

applied to it."

Phew – the community or zune-zune sharing (as the p2p social stuff

is called) isn’t outright evil and blatantly stupid.  But will it be

good enough to ‘go viral’ on its p2p sharing of user generated

content?  From what I’ve read, probably not (at least this version).


Zune-to-Zune Sharing: Yep, it’s limited. It’s not what we all

wanted. But it is a unique feature that nobody else can really claim.

The key phrase is "three days or three plays." Beaming a song to

another Zune happens pretty quickly, and then they can listen to it

three times or for three days, whichever comes first. After that, the

song is gone but the metadata remains, so they can easily find/buy it

if they liked it.


So, we will have to wait – firstly to see how zune v1.0 plays out in

the marketplace, then whether  the zune team are able to see the light

and act (i.e. build and ship v3.0) before someone else gets this right

and creates the real iPod killer.

I sure hope zuneguy and his mates will cast some light on this.

Fang – Mike Seyfang

technorati tags:, , , , ,


About mseyfang

Interruptus Digitalis
This entry was posted in Munge. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s